seriously, it’s getting to a point that you can’t make a negative comment about someone without being charged as a racist, homophobe or sexist!
if you criticize a female, you are obviously sexist.
if you criticize someone who happens to be gay, you must hate homosexuals.
There was an incident in the news this last week about a white restaurant patron that got fed up with the loud, obnoxious behavior of two black women patrons. It escalated and she told them that they were acting like n*ggers.
Yup, the n-word is verbotten for whites. Now the blacks, that's a different story. That can call each other n#gger all they want. I guess it's now their word and they sure make good use of it.
check out this very strange convention clip:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjvb8d7luyy.
Happy people clapping and waving.
Strange?
the last lines from the movie platoon.
"i think now, looking back, we did not fight the enemy, we fought ourselves, and the enemy was in us.
the war is over for me now, but it will always be there, the rest of my days.
"Mother of Mercy. Is this the end of Rico?"
Little Caesar.
Edward G. Robinson
i won’t steal barb’s thunder, but has anyone had a chance to peruse the appeal that watchtower launched yesterday?.
watchtower’s main argument is that stuff was said in confidence with confidentiality surrounding that confidence and they are confident that clergy confidentiality which is in confidence is confidential.. in short, it ‘was a secret and should stay a secret.’.
omg.. and watchtower claims that this verdict “violates the constitution of the usa”.. i wish the jury could tack on another $50m and include watchtower lawyers are to be hanged.. i just had to say something.
This brief demonstrates that, contrary to the judgment below, Defendants
did not violate the reporting statute. And even if they did, there is no evidence
they acted with the “actual malice” necessary to justify punitive damages, and
especially not the unlawful and shockingly excessive award of $31 million in
punitive damages.
They did not, and even if they did...
...unlawful and shockingly excessive award of $31 million...
I can sense the court giving in already.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehsw_8xe7zq.
,I don`t know whether to love him or loathe him ?
Anybody ?
I go for loath him. How can any civilized person like that crap?
top shelf tony must be in his element commemorating in the closet..
Your giving Tony a bad rap.
From what I understand, it's his wife that likes whiskey.
alyssa milano is saying that women have to go on a sex strike to take control of their bodies.
what do you think about this?.
blondie said, " a woman already has the choice to have sex or not, otherwise it is rape; this is true of any adult, it is their choice."
I wish every woman would look her future husband straight in the eye and tell him that.
i know many people support leniency for illegal aliens.
they feel terrible for them and often feel laws should be changed so we can welcome people who are not as fortunate as we might be.. would you allow an illegal alien to reside with you in your home, with your family?
.
Of course they have to bring up a man who could easily pass for some kind of thug. These people are crazy to even consider let someone into their homes. It could destroy them and their family. Give them access. Go to work and let them have the run of your house every day. And guaranteed they do not have looking for work on their list of priorities. Just crazy. Now if it was a young and good looking 20 year old girl, okay, I would give it some serious thought.
yep, we are back after taking some extended time off.. the jwleaks.org website had been archived for some time.
i was concentrating on other jw-related projects in relation to say sorry.. but the governing body of jehovah's witnesses, who no longer claim to be infallible, decided that in their fallibility the best use of 'dedicated funds' would be to launch civil action against me in a us federal court.
to this end watch tower bible and tract society of pennsylvania, inc., sent their attorneys after me.
bbwt ...I like the fact that Stephen Lett says about doing(?) the math(?) : "the amount of money flowing out will be MUCH GREATER then the amount of money flowing in" . Boy can they be anymore dumbed downed than this group of GB? He has a very limited vocabulary full of under statements full of denial to say the least...
That's not quite what Lett said. The words were carefully chosen to give the impression that so much more was going than coming, hence the words 'flowing out' and 'coming in'. You see? Not money 'going out' and money 'flowing in'. Of course you will never be told just how much is flowing in or flowing out. In that case the lowly publisher could decide for themselves just how serious the problem is.
